By finding the url address of the previous version of the catalog website and by analyzing archived versions of both websites (for details, please see my a bit chaotic rationale here and comments to it, especially this and this) , I was able to on the previous was able to establish that this year there were 7 exoplanets added to the catalog as potentially habitable, including one added on March 21 after the question has started (it is TOI-904 c - publication about it is from December 2023 - do not to confuse it with LHS 1140 which was already in the catalog - see this comment for details), so this one counts towards 5 needed for the resolution as "yes".
So the planets added this year are all 6 discovered in 2023: TOI-700 e
TOI-715 b
HN Lib b
Wolf 1069 b
GJ 367 d
TOI-904 c (added to the catalog on the 21st of March, so it counts toward the resolution, but it shows that some potentially habitable exoplanets discovered in the late 2024 might not be added to the catalog in time to be counted for the resolution, so this kind of nullifies advantage we got from TOI-904 c being counted late)
The last exoplanet added to the list this year is K2-3 d and what is critical information, it was discovered in 2015 (see this comment for how I established it). So now we know that the researchers behind the catalog are not only adding the most recent discoveries but are also analyzing exoplanets discovered in the past (see this chart) - without further analysis of archived data it is hard to say how often they find something they have not yet found in the previous years, but 2014 and 2016 gave them a lot of material, and they might be still analyzing some of it. So there is a chance that this will be a source of some additions to the catalog this year (or in January 2024) as well.
Why do you think you're right?
By finding the url address of the previous version of the catalog website and by analyzing archived versions of both websites (for details, please see my a bit chaotic rationale here and comments to it, especially this and this) , I was able to on the previous was able to establish that this year there were 7 exoplanets added to the catalog as potentially habitable, including one added on March 21 after the question has started (it is TOI-904 c - publication about it is from December 2023 - do not to confuse it with LHS 1140 which was already in the catalog - see this comment for details), so this one counts towards 5 needed for the resolution as "yes".
So the planets added this year are all 6 discovered in 2023:
TOI-700 e
TOI-715 b
HN Lib b
Wolf 1069 b
GJ 367 d
TOI-904 c (added to the catalog on the 21st of March, so it counts toward the resolution, but it shows that some potentially habitable exoplanets discovered in the late 2024 might not be added to the catalog in time to be counted for the resolution, so this kind of nullifies advantage we got from TOI-904 c being counted late)
The last exoplanet added to the list this year is K2-3 d and what is critical information, it was discovered in 2015 (see this comment for how I established it). So now we know that the researchers behind the catalog are not only adding the most recent discoveries but are also analyzing exoplanets discovered in the past (see this chart) - without further analysis of archived data it is hard to say how often they find something they have not yet found in the previous years, but 2014 and 2016 gave them a lot of material, and they might be still analyzing some of it. So there is a chance that this will be a source of some additions to the catalog this year (or in January 2024) as well.
Tagging @404_NOT_FOUND @ctsats @cmeinel @probahilliby @PeterStamp @ScottEastman @NoUsernameSelected @DimaKlenchin @WeirdAwkward @guyrecord @Perspectus @JJMLP
Why might you be wrong?
I need to understand their update pattern and research vs publication (update on website) timeline. Will they soon go dark until January 2024?