If the discussion is about the probability of using weapons with high destructive potential, some delimitation in focal points can be made to propaedeutic support of the choices I made. In search of synthesis, I point out that the decline of the American empire, resulting from the change of the phrase "speak softly and have a big stick" to "talk rough and threaten everyone with your big stick", there is to generate a series of war and systematic conflicts among themselves that can be studied in the history books of the future as "the third world war". With the loss of American global hegemony, the multiraletral mechanisms created by that same hegemony must fall for last or be maintained for pure symbolism, and obstacles such as those of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons will lose their effectiveness. Therefore, I believe that I am certain by the decline of the United States of America not to be a theory anymore and a decaying empire has proved to be one of the most dangerous animals on earth.
No Scores Yet
Relative Brier Score
Questions Forecasted
2
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
| Comments | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Definitions | |||||
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
I talked to a colleague on this subject and he pointed out that, at a certain moment, the multilateria instances present around the globe, despite being created by North American hegemony, have broken away from this country at a certain time, which would make its operation, sometimes peaceful, was combative in a scenario of escalation of armed conflicts with the use of any of these weapons pointed. So, I may be wrong to be disbelieving in the power of this international articulation that possibly can praise for world peace instead of corroborating with its end.
Why do you think you're right?
The latest release attachments make OpenIA consolidated as the benchmark in the market
They will probably try to cheapen the product
Why might you be wrong?
I might be wrong if the discussions about the AI market bubble are true
Why do you think you're right?
The scientific progress so far experienced was not spontaneous, but rather controlled through a rigid system of checking the hypotheses that lead scientists to innovate in their respective fields. So much so that the COVID-19 pandemic was largely due to historical factors of Chinese eating habits than to human failures in these biological engineering tests. So, I believe the chances of a new similar disaster are minimal by the maturity of the scientific community to walk in slow steps to continue presenting substantial progress every day.
Why might you be wrong?
The historical time that we live of the rise of authoritarian leaders and tension in the four corners of the political board of the globe can nullify any scientific criterion in favor of hypothetical hard power. In other words, if in a war one or both parties do not respect the ties of the international order and if it is not protected by strong third parties, what prevents a disease manufactured to kill being the new mustard gas of the XXI century?