SPECIAL NOTICE: INFER is now the RAND Forecasting Initiative (RFI). Learn more about RFI.
 

kuudes

About:
Show more

0.000008

Relative Brier Score

0

Forecasts

0

Upvotes
Forecasting Activity
Forecasting Calendar
 

Past Week Past Month Past Year This Season All Time
Forecasts 0 0 11 11 21
Comments 0 0 8 8 11
Questions Forecasted 0 0 7 7 14
Upvotes on Comments By This User 0 0 5 5 5
 Definitions
New Comment
thanks @sanyero for the comment!

I did some digging on internet re question if Nvidia can meet demand. It seems to me that they very likely already have the resources to meet even very high demand very fast by changing part of their current gaming GPU fabbing slots to datacenter gpu slots, as they use same TSMC technology. It seems to me they have done this arbitrage also in the past with the cryptomining boom.

The open question that remains is how much demand will there be for the GPUs, but it seems to me coming 12 months might be quite high in demand given now also governments have started to make random billion dollar projects and purchase orders for the GPUs because of cloud sovereignty. Commercially one still would presume future and current revenue of next year is still lower than the maximum price of capital, ie the datacenter GPUs, that bring the revenue, so for revenue of 1 G$ next year one might expect companies willing to make current investment purchases of maybe at least 10 G$ now. So GPU sales should be maybe at least 1 year before meaningful revenues of AI use start to come in, and this should lead to revenue structure where first Nvidia and datacenter constructors gain revenue, and then later after that AI operators gain revenue from customers. So for each dollar of AI revenue next year, Nvidia likely should earn more than 1 dollar this year.

But, on supply: apparently Nvidia shipped already in 2023 3.7 million GPU units for data centers, which is a higher number than their previous plans of 2 million h100s for 2024. I guess many of last year's might have been something else than hoppers.

Given Hopper uses same process than 40-series of consumer GPUs, and given there has been 24 million such sold in 2022; and given hopper seems to have 4/3 die size compared to 4090 and blackwell twice of that; it seems to me it is plausible Nvidia can make up to 18 million hoppers per year and up to 9 million blackwells, if they want to cannibalize all of their consumer GPUs.

Given h100 costs 30000$, last year's 3.7M units in hoppers would be about 100 G$, presuming no growth from last year. Earnings of 22.5 G$ for last quarter would be about in line with that.

Sources:

https://www.hpcwire.com/2024/06/10/nvidia-shipped-3-76-million-data-center-gpus-in-2023-according-to-study/ 2024-07-10

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-to-reportedly-triple-output-of-compute-gpus-in-2024-up-to-2-million-h100s 2023-08-24

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/nvidia-increases-blackwell-orders-from-tsmc-by-25-percent-18m-gb200-nvl36-server-cabinet-expected-to-account-for-bulk-of-deliveries/ 2024-07-16

https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/8094994?from=edn_maintab_index 2024-07-15

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-rtx-4090.c3889

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwell_(microarchitecture)

https://wccftech.com/nvidia-to-dominate-data-center-share-in-2024-46-billion-usd-revenue-expected/ 2024-02-01

https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/pc-gaming/steam-survey-suggests-more-people-bought-the-rtx-4090-than-the-steam-deck-along-with-millions-of-other-rtx-40-series-gpus 2024-01-02

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-maintains-lead-as-sales-of-graphics-cards-hit-all-time-low-in-2022-jpr 2023-03-04

https://www.trendforce.com/news/2024/07/02/news-nvidias-h200-order-delivered-from-q3-boosting-server-supply-chain-with-strong-demand/ 2024-07-02

https://longportapp.com/en/news/206075733 2024-06-12
Files
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

It seems to me datacenter GPU demand may indeed keep increasing. If no AI winter comes, Nvidia should be able to keep up with the demand by cannibalizing its gaming GPU production, perhaps at least 1 year from now. In addition to cloud operators it seems governments are now waking to needing to have sovereign clouds, so governments are starting to spend discretionary billions worth on someone near them buying GPUs.

For full disclosure I have a personal investment stake on the matter pro growth, although I hope for computation caps for personal reasons.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Sudden AI winter might come or Taiwan might get invaded.

Files
New Badge
kuudes
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

They have been reducing their footprint heavily.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Reductions are not closing, so unsure if the definitions of the question will be crossed

Files
New Badge
kuudes
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
kuudes
made their 2nd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
2023 Q2
0% (0%)
2023 Q3
0% (0%)
2023 Q4
0% (0%)
2024 Q1
0% (0%)
2024 Q2
Confirmed previous forecast
Files
New Badge
kuudes
earned a new badge:

Upvotes Received

New Badge
kuudes
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-asks-hundreds-china-based-041944118.html (May 16, 2024)

"(Reuters) — Microsoft is asking some of its China-based employees to consider transferring outside the country, the company said on Thursday, as relations between U.S. and China grow increasingly strained over technologies like artificial intelligence and semiconductors.

The Wall Street Journal, which first reported the news, said Microsoft is asking about 700 to 800 people who are involved in machine learning and other work related to cloud computing to consider relocating."

Files
Why might you be wrong?

The news does not specifically mention AI. They might not make a statement in a way which would settle the question as defined by INFER.

Files
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

in https://investor.tsmc.com/sites/ir/annual-report/2023/2023%20Annual%20Report_E.pdf it is said North America was 68% in 2023, so unlikely any quarter it was that much lower; Given no such major news still, it seems really implausible such would have happened this year 2024 either

Files
Why might you be wrong?

I could misunderstand time terms, financial years etc are often different from calendar years; I could miss something and actually something that was elsewhere calculated as North America would not actually be calculated North America here

Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username