With the Trump admin restarting nuclear talks, geopolitical volatility is likely to fall a bit for the next several months?
-0.0098
Relative Brier Score
Questions Forecasted
Scored Questions
17
Forecasts
1
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecasts | 0 | 13 | 63 | 17 | 462 |
Comments | 0 | 13 | 21 | 17 | 153 |
Questions Forecasted | 0 | 13 | 21 | 15 | 63 |
Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 51 |
Definitions |


Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Relations with Israel remain such that war is a real possibility.

Why do you think you're right?
With Trump & Co back in office, I think the odds go up a bit, particularly for Saudi and Saudi-friendly nations.
Why might you be wrong?
Israel is still fighting in Gaza, making it a bit of a non-starter until that's resolved.

Why do you think you're right?
Looks like Argentina continues to trend in the right direction and they all have benefited from relatively lower tariffs in the trade war, so I'm not sure there's a near-term catalyst for any of these three?
Why might you be wrong?
Bolivia appears the riskiest at present, and you never know what's next in the trade war...

Why do you think you're right?
Nearly out of time on this one.
Why might you be wrong?
Assassination? Putin steps down as part of a peace deal? All seems extremely unlikely.

Why do you think you're right?
With the Trump tariffs, although Egypt's position has deteriorated when looking only at Egypt (10% tariff added), it's actually improved relative to much of the world, so if anything this might end up being a net-opportunity for Egypt?
Why might you be wrong?
A global recession could well swamp Egypt's relative gains and the Egyptian economy with it

Why do you think you're right?
Likelihood of this seems vanishingly low. All three are NATO countries and Russia's military capabilities seem to have declined and are likely to continue to do so over the period of the question.
Why might you be wrong?
I suspect you'd have to see a near total break down of NATO, led by the US pulling out and the remaining alliance at least partially disintegrating after. Even still, European nations are improving their capabilities while Russia's decline, so this doesn't seem like a war Russia will want.

Why do you think you're right?
I suspect the best shot at starting a ceasefire is still in the near future, and then not again until the fall when military opportunity declines again?
Why might you be wrong?
Trump's bluster might have little impact on Russia's resolve, and they may push for more than Ukraine/Trump are willing to accept.

Why do you think you're right?
Reducing for time. Most plausible is probably an attack on an oil well, but many of these are run by American companies and I can't see Venezuela taking that risk?
Why might you be wrong?
There does seem to have been some escalation from Venezuela, though I'm not sure it's enough to represent a true risk of an attack on an oil well at this point.

Why do you think you're right?
Looks like there's some friction in Zimbabwe in particular, but otherwise it doesn't seem like there's particularly higher risk than the base rate would suggest at this point.
Why might you be wrong?
I imagine events move quickly, so there might not be much of an obvious ramp up leading to a particular coup?
Why do you think you're right?
42 so far, by my count, representing a pretty dramatically accelerated pace compared to the previous couple years. I suspect we might yet regress toward the mean a bit, but maybe it'll remain high while negotiations over a ceasefire occur?
Why might you be wrong?
Rapid mean reversion once the German government is finally formed is possible, or it could ramp up even further while ceasefire negotiations continue and/or as a cheap attack while costs from actual military spending in Ukraine cause budget issues for Russia.