sepeskoe

About:
Show more

No Scores Yet

Relative Brier Score
1371500246810121416
Questions Forecasted

34

Forecasts

16

Upvotes
Forecasting Activity
Forecasting Calendar
LessMoreJanFebMarAprSuMoTuWeThFrSa
 

Past Week Past Month Past Year This Season All Time
Forecasts 2 11 125 34 630
Comments 3 11 36 32 264
Questions Forecasted 2 8 27 15 103
Upvotes on Comments By This User 3 5 24 16 51
 Definitions
New Prediction
sepeskoe
made their 2nd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
1 January 2025 - 31 March 2025
2% (0%)
1 April 2025 - 30 June 2025
3% (-1%)
1 July 2025 - 30 September 2025
12% (+1%)
1 October 2025 - 31 December 2025
83% (0%)
Not before 2026
Why do you think you're right?

Trump's manufactured tariff crisis has overtaken the Russo/Ukraine conflict as critical issues he's working on (and I don't think he can handle many issues at a time -- he's somewhat one-track and not always up on the latest facts).  The reopening of Israel's invasion of Gaza, as defensible as it may be, is also getting more attention by Trump than is Ukraine right now.

Zelenskyy very unhappily agreed to the Trump proposed cease-fire, which appeared to favor Russia a lot more than it favored Ukraine.  But Zelenskyy had practically no choice -- Ukraine needs US weaponry and financial support.  Putin did not agree -- he didn't think the terms were favorable enough to Russia, and he didn't like the security agreement for Ukraine -- even though Ukraine would forego NATO membership, it still seemed to put the EU and NATO on Russia's doorstep.  So, it's going to take time to get to a full cease-fire.  Depends upon the tariff situation (quite notably, there's no reciprocal tariff on Russia) and the Gaza / West Bank situation.

So, I'm making a slight adjustment to lower weights on a deal before 30 September and adding it to the remainder of CY25.  I just don't think Trump is going to be putting pressure on Putin to come to the table for real -- he's too busy meeting with every country to "negotiate" bilateral tariff and trade deals.  Better off just to seize Russian assets in the US and EU and give them to Ukraine (after taking something off the top to repay the US for its investment so far).  Maybe that will make Putin come to the table.  Hard to judge how much influence the Russian Oligarchs will have on Putin -- do they have more spine than the Republicans in the House and Senate?

Files
Why might you be wrong?

If miraculously, the tariff and trade crisis and stock market and subsequent recession, and Gaza /Israel don't take up all of Trump's time, then he may work harder on Putin.  But until then, too much of his cease-fire plan depends upon US companies willing to invest in Ukraine for mining "raw metals" (those are Trump's words, not mine), and until the economy recovers, the US companies don't have enough money nor a desire to invest in Ukraine right now.  Probably don't want to invest in Russian mining either -- can't trust Putin not to nationalize the resources once the hard work and heavy investment is done.

Files
Plataea479
made a comment:

I totally agree. Who wants to make a deal with an unpredictable partner like Trump. Actually Trump and Putin repudiate international agreements. They signed but 5 years ago. Trump repudiated USMCA and Putin  repudiated Minsk. Birds of a feather fly together. There has been too much conscious parallelism if not collusion between Putin and Trump for many years.

If Trump stops Ukraine supplies and Intel or even slow walks both, Ukraine will have to sue for peace based on EU support alone after  Jan. 1 2025  

Then instead of Molotov Ribbentrop we will get Rubio Lavrov. Then they can argue about dividing up Eastern Europe and like Stalin at Yalta he is not giving up conquered territory. Putin is the neo Stalin. He wants Yalta II but no Churchill

I can't figure out what Trump is. He's like an irrational number in mathematics.

Files
New Badge
sepeskoe
earned a new badge:

Upvotes Received

New Badge
sepeskoe
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

As a result of Trump's new reciprocal tariffs, there's a race to the bottom among the top tech companies' market cap.  Nvidia and Apple are heading downwards a little faster than Microsoft.  As of 8 April, MS is the largest, followed by Apple then Nvidia.  So, the question becomes more about which company will bounce back faster after Trump negotiates highly "tailored" trade agreements with China, Japan, Taiwan, India, South Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, ...  Is there enough time for the market caps to bounce back prior to the end of May?  Maybe.  Which company can bounce back faster?  Which companies will deal with China's own pressure on US companies doing business in China better than the others?  My guess is that China would be tougher on companies that employ fewer Chinese resources and that can ship their goods from China to countries other than the US.  Does that mean that Apple will get a better deal in China than McDonalds gets? maybe.  A better deal for Apple than Nvidia? debatable.  Approx 90-95% of Apple's electronics products are manufactured in China; 20% of their sales of Apple's revenues come from China.  Nvidia exports H20 chips to China, accounting for ~12% of Nvidia's revenues.  However, China is encouraging their own manufacturers to decrease the reliance on Nvidia AI chips, so maybe Nvidia gets more pressure than Apple would get, since Apple might be more important to China's own economy than Nvidia is.  But Microsoft is least impacted by tariffs among the Magnificant 7.  https://fortune.com/2025/04/04/microsoft-stock-trump-tariffs-safe-haven-magnificent-7-big-tech-bloodbath/

So, unless Trump somehow backs off his newly intensified trade war with China (and Vietnam, Cambodia, India, ....), I expect MS to be the largest US company at the end of May, with Apple 2nd and Nvidia at best 3rd.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Trump could do what Trump often does: declare victory when he's actually won nothing.  When the US oligarchs finally convince Trump that his tariffs are a bad idea, will he wriggle out of the drastic import duties that he swears will go into effect this week?  If he does, who bounces back faster?  I may be wrong about Nvidia being slower to bounce back -- they are more dependent upon the AI market, but China is trying to bring that inhouse.  Apple is more directly important than Nvidia is to China's own economy, but that may not factor int0 China's basis for negotiations.  Maybe furniture and TVs are more important Chinese exports are than Apple or Nvidia, and thus China focuses on products other than phones, iPads, etc and chips.

Files
New Badge
sepeskoe
earned a new badge:

Star Commenter - Mar 2025

Earned for making 5+ comments in a month (rationales not included).
New Prediction
sepeskoe
made their 1st forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0%
Less than 30 days
25%
30 days
16%
31-60 days
9%
61-90 days
50%
91 days or more
Why do you think you're right?

I view this as a truncated hazard function -- the longer the agreement lasts, the longer it's going to continue.  But it has to get over that 90-day hump.  I think there's a point of inflection at 30 days and 90 days.  But both Ukraine and Russia have suffered so many casualties and economic impacts that both entities will want to hang onto a ceasefire -- as long as Ukraine's security is guaranteed by Russia and enforced by the West and Russia gets to keep the land it's captured.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

There is an infinite number of reasons

Files
sepeskoe
made a comment:
@ScottEastman   I wrestled with this, but my final rationale: both Zelensky and Putin want to be in Trump's good graces for their own purposes.  Thus, I think both of them will try very hard to demonstrate good will to Trump's peace efforts and neither wants to be the one to show Trump that they aren't ready to bring peace to the region.  Therefore, if they go through the effort to finally negotiate some terms of even a very fragile agreement, they will strive to make it last to at least some significant milestone.  I do think it's too fragile to last a whole lot past that.  Why might I be wrong? there's absolutely no trust among those leaders.  But I do think there is sufficient fear of the damage Trump can do to each side to make an initial agreement last for a month.
Files
New Prediction
sepeskoe
made their 1st forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0%
1 January 2025 - 31 March 2025
2%
1 April 2025 - 30 June 2025
4%
1 July 2025 - 30 September 2025
11%
1 October 2025 - 31 December 2025
83%
Not before 2026
Why do you think you're right?

I'm giving Trump some credit.  Some smart person is going to come up with a deal that Trump can sell to Putin and Zelensky.   I don't know if it's dropping sanctions vs Russia, a deal for Ukrainian "raw mineral" rights (OK, I'm letting my anti-Trump biases slip in here), Ukraine agreeing to ceded land to Russia, Russia giving Ukraine complete and unimpeded access to Black Sea ports for grain shipment, an agreement to use impounded Russian funds in Europe and the US to help rebuild Ukraine's infrastructure.....far too many components for me to calculate any real likelihood now, which indicates to me that even good faith negotiations are unlikely to take less than 6 months to strike a sufficiently comprehensive agreement that could support a ceasefire.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Does Trump lose interest?  Is he so busy screwing up international trade that he just doesn't apply any resources to this region?  If anything, at this point, I'm probably putting too much weight on YES within this forecasting window.

Files
New Prediction
sepeskoe
made their 10th forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
Forecast Window
0% (0%)
Yes
Mar 28, 2025 to Sep 28, 2025
100% (0%)
No
Mar 28, 2025 to Sep 28, 2025
Why do you think you're right?

China is busy figuring out what to do re: Trump's tariffs.  There isn't an immediate need nor upside to an action vs Taiwan at this time, nor do I think there would be an upside during this forecast's time horizon.  If Xi wants to make some financial headway while the US is distracted, he should move in Africa, Mexico or Canada, or even South America -- why use military assets when he can use some soft power to make headway vs the US and EU.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

If the US and EU are busy worrying about Ukraine and Iran, Xi may take advantage of the distractions and move on Taiwan.  But I still don't see that as a high priority to China right now -- the trade situation with the US swamps any action vs Taiwan at this point.

Files
New Prediction
Confirmed previous forecast
Files
New Prediction
sepeskoe
made their 2nd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
70% (-10%)
Yes
30% (+10%)
No
Why do you think you're right?

As time marches, I'm less sanguinary about an agreement.  This Black Sea agreement is taking longer than I expected, as is the agreement to stop bombing utilities/infrastructure.  Neither of those agreements would be sufficient to achieve a "yes" on this question, so the longer they take, the less likely it is that one or two such partial cease fires could grow into a full regional cease fire.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Trump wants his Nobel Peace Prize.  He's driven by that and he's an extremely impatient man.  He'll come up with something to offer Putin to get a ceasefire.  (I haven't figured out a good DOGE angle here, yet.  But somehow Musk may enter the process and have some impact.  But I don't have any good ideas, yet.)

Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username