gcahlik

I'm closely following this as an export compliance specialist; having worked both on enforcement and corporate compliance.    I'll comment further when I have more time (this is a very complex problem) but I feel as though the problem from a regulatory standpoint is multifaceted.  The government is highly reliant on industry (and probably more importantly and often overlooked, academia) to interpret export regulations and self-regulate the development of AI.  BIS has been playing catch-up for the past three or four years, when it was probably already at least half a decade behind and has been relying on list-based end user controls to impose licensing requirements and enforce them rather than having a comprehensive and holistic approach to AI and its derivative technologies.