Time issues aside (we have only 15 days before the question's cutoff date), here is The Guardian, today:
Russia’s deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, said Russia would not agree to troops from Nato countries operating in Ukraine “under any circumstances”. It was unclear whether that formulation also included troops drawn from Nato countries operating under a separate non-Nato command.
I am not sure why the journalist insists that "it was unclear" whether this objection also applies to NATO countries under a non-NATO command; this seems crystal clear to me, and it has been consistently repeated several times from very high level Russian officials...
Why do you think you're right?
We now have Q3 data for all OECD countries save for Iceland (data explorer).
As I have shown below, the weighting scheme used for the aggregate reading is very similar (although not identical) with the weights used by the OECD for the calculation of the global CPI. So, here is the situation regarding the OECD countries with a weight >= 2.0:
In other news, the US reading for November also just came in at a comfortable level of 71.7 (data explorer; surprisingly enough, the October reading is still pending). I have updated accordingly the summary table below.
As I have already argued, the situation seems consistent with a scenario where the Q3 reading does not dramatically depart from the status quo of ~70.35 in either direction.
Affirming 100% for the [70, 74) bin.
Why might you be wrong?
Very black swans only (or substantial revisions to data and/or the calculation methodology).