I'm upping my forecast slightly to 12%, in anticipation of the volatility that will result from Trump's April 2 announcement of global tarriffs. It's still unclear whether Trump plans to levy individual tariff rates on all US trading partners; put tariffs on only some countries; or apply a universal tariff (perhaps as high as 20%) on all imports. A 20% universal tariff combined with full retaliation from other nations on US goods would be a “worst-case scenario” for the US economy. But whatever the scope, both Apple and NVIDIA will be negatiovely impacted. Which one will be more so?
1. I think Apple's extensive reliance on Chinese manufacturing makes it more immediately vulnerable to tariffs on Chinese imports. The complexity and scale of Apple's supply chain mean that shifting production is a formidable task, potentially leading to higher consumer prices or squeezed profit margins in the short term.
2. NVIDIA, while also affected by tariffs, appears to be taking aggressive steps to localize production and reduce exposure to international trade disputes. Its significant investments in U.S. manufacturing could mitigate some tariff impacts over time.
3. Thus, I think in the short term Apple may be more negatively impacted by across-the-board U.S. tariffs on China and the EU due to its deep-rooted manufacturing ties with China and the challenges associated with rapidly altering its supply chain. NVIDIA's strategic investments in domestic manufacturing may position it to better navigate and potentially lessen the adverse effects of such tariffs in the longer term. As a result I am slightly raising my forecast to 12% that NVIDIA would overtake Apple in Market Cap as of 5/231/25. I may readjust after I see the scope of Trump's tarrifs tomorrow.
Why do you think you're right?
Dropping slightly to 22% I'm looking a several overlapping drivers:
Current Negotiation Stalemate: Recent efforts toward a ceasefire have encountered significant obstacles. While Ukraine accepted a U.S.-proposed 30-day ceasefire, Russia rejected it, citing unmet demands such as the lifting of Western sanctions and Ukraine's non-NATO status.
Continued Hostilities: Despite ongoing diplomatic engagements, both nations have persisted in military operations, including a devastating Russian missile strike on Kryvyi Rih that resulted in 19 civilian casualties including 9 children. Active fighting -- and Russian war crimes against the Ukrainian civilian population -- continue unabated.
Incompatible Strategic Objectives: Russia's insistence on conditions such as Ukraine's demilitarization, recognition of territorial annexations, and a permanent ban on Ukrainian membership in NATO are unacceptable to the government and people of Ukraine. Ukraine’s demands for complete Russian troop withdrawal and full restoration of its territorial integrity are equally unacceptable to Russia.
The substantial gaps between the parties' positions, the continuation of active hostilities,, Russia’s belief that it has a decisive military advantage for the next 6-8 months, and the resolution terms (i.e., it cannot be a temporary, localized, or partial ceasefire) suggest that a full, national ceasefire before October 1, 2025, is possible but not close to probable.
Why might you be wrong?
Public Sentiment and War Fatigue: Surveys indicate a growing desire among Ukrainians for a negotiated end to the conflict, with some openness to concessions. Its possible Ukrainian publc demands for a ceaefire even with unfavorable terms may continue to grow between now and October until it reaches a point where the Zelenskyy government must comply.